Pakistan-India conflict, UN Security Council, Kashmir dispute, India-Pakistan tensions, UN mediation, regional peace, Indus Water Treaty, South Asia security, diplomatic efforts, international relations.
Pakistan successfully requests a closed-door UN Security Council meeting to address escalating tensions with India. UN Secretary-General Guterres offers mediation as tensions rise, with both nations urged to avoid military conflict.
India's Water Aggression Against Pakistan: After Baglihar, Salal Dam Gates Also Closed
India's water aggression against Pakistan continues; after Baglihar, the gates of the Salal Dam have also been closed. On Sunday, India began stopping water flowing towards Pakistan through the Baglihar Dam, resulting in a continuous decrease in the flow of water in the Chenab River. Now, India has also closed the gates of the Salal Dam. India has reduced the water flow in the Chenab River by a total of 35,600 cusecs over two days, leaving the inflow at only 5,300 cusecs. Indian media claims that India, moving further in its water aggression, is also planning to stop water from the Kishanganga Dam, which is expected to further reduce the flow in the Jhelum River. Earlier, on April 26, without any prior notice, India released a massive flood wave into the Jhelum River, suddenly raising the water level by 15 feet at the Chakothi point.
Beginning of India-Pakistan Tensions: War-Like Situation After Pahalgam Incident, Indus Waters Treaty in Danger
On April 22, a tragic firing incident occurred in the Pahalgam district of Indian-occupied Kashmir, resulting in the deaths of 26 people and injuries to more than a dozen others, reigniting tensions in South Asia. India’s Hindu nationalist government, without a transparent investigation into the incident, immediately blamed Pakistan following its traditional blame game policy. Along with this, India not only announced the suspension of the historic 1960 Indus Waters Treaty but also began war preparations, escalating the threat of war in South Asia.
This raised global suspicions — was this attack a false flag operation, and why is India reluctant to investigate? Why does it keep moving toward war? On the other hand, India’s own intelligence agencies blamed the current government.
Yet, the government seems determined to push the region’s people into the fire of war — even though the opposing country is not weak but a powerful, nuclear-armed nation with one of the world’s most battle-hardened armies. This is not a case where a powerful country attacks a weaker one, as often seen in history.
India beat the drums of war by first stopping the flow of rivers passing through its land and entering Pakistan.
It began firing from its posts along the Line of Control (LoC), in response to which Pakistan destroyed Indian posts and captured one Indian soldier alive.
Showing responsibility and restraint, Pakistani officials continued to advise India in a calm tone: investigate first, identify those responsible, don’t push the region into war just for electoral gains. Millions will die, economies will collapse, people will suffer. If nuclear attacks occur or radiation spreads, no one will step foot in your country — there will be no investment, and your citizens won’t be allowed into other countries.
If you attack, Pakistan will retaliate. If you use nuclear weapons, they will use them too. Pakistan has a population of 250 million, while India has 1.44 billion — your losses will be far greater, many lives will be lost. Because if Pakistan goes down, it will take you with it.
But India’s biased government remains stubborn and has begun following the path of Israel. It shows no concern for the lives or property of its own people. It listens to no one. Just attack after attack — what an emotional leader India has got.
Efforts to prevent war by China, the United States, Switzerland, the United Nations, and many other countries are feared to go in vain.
On the other hand, Pakistan strongly rejected India's unilateral announcement and emphasized the need to adhere to international laws and treaties. Pakistan’s Foreign Office stated that the Indus Waters Treaty is an international agreement that cannot be suspended based on any single country's unilateral decision, and suspending it would directly impact global peace and security.
-----------
From Karachi, Pakistan to Ahmedabad, India: The Journey of Two American Helicopters – Who Were the Passengers?
Following the terrorist incident in Pahalgam, occupied Kashmir, and India’s subsequent accusations, tensions between the two countries have escalated severely, with war clouds looming overhead. Both nations have closed their airspace, yet on Sunday afternoon, two American helicopters traveled from Karachi’s Jinnah International Airport to the Indian city of Ahmedabad.
According to aviation sources, the two helicopters, bearing American registration, arrived from Sharjah around 1 PM on Sunday, flying at low altitude over the Arabian Sea. The two Leonardo AW139 helicopters, operated by West Star Aviation and privately owned, remained at Karachi’s Jinnah International Airport for nearly two hours.
As per ATC sources, upon entering India, both helicopters ascended to 11,000 feet and eventually landed at Ahmedabad Airport. By late night, the helicopters were still present in Ahmedabad.
Who were the passengers aboard these helicopters, and for what purpose did they travel from Karachi to India? No information could be immediately obtained. Efforts were made to get details from the spokesperson of the Pakistan Airport Authority, but no response was received till late at night
-----------
Nuclear War Between Pakistan and India Is Unimaginable, Says U.S. Congressman
A ceremony was held at a New York hotel in honor of U.S. Republican Congressmen Jack Bergman and Keith Self, attended by prominent members of the Pakistani-American community. Participants drew the Congressmen’s attention to the rising tensions caused by the Pahalgam incident and India’s war hysteria.
Pakistani-American Tanveer Ahmed told the Congressmen that since the inception of Pakistan, India has been involved in numerous false flag operations against it. In this case too, an FIR was registered within just ten minutes of the Pahalgam incident—despite the nearest police station being an hour away from the shooting location. Moreover, India immediately blamed Pakistan without presenting any evidence.
Tanveer Ahmed questioned what role the United States would play in such a scenario.
Congressman Jack Bergman said the level of detail shared by Tanveer Ahmed helped him better understand the issue. While it may sound pessimistic, the truth is that humans—being fallible—are often the reason such efforts fail.
Bergman added that the United States, along with like-minded free nations, should set an example to the world that different outcomes are possible across different times and regions in history.
Congressman Keith Self stated that issues between Pakistan and India have persisted for decades. Both are important nations—Pakistan with a population of 250 million and India with nearly 1.4 billion—and both are nuclear powers.
He told attendees that he once commanded a U.S. Special Forces nuclear unit and often carried a nuclear suitcase. He also served as a Strategic Nuclear Watch officer for a year, reviewing war plans and simulating scenarios such as the destruction of the Pentagon or NORAD. He said the concept of nuclear war is beyond imagination.
Congressman Keith Self emphasized that once a war begins, it cannot be controlled—it spirals in unforeseen directions. He expressed hope that India and Pakistan will keep their differences de-escalated until resolved, as even imagining a war between them is unthinkable.
Participants expressed hope that the United States would help defuse the war hysteria emerging from India\
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres Offers Mediation Between Pakistan and India
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, speaking with the media at his headquarters in New York, said that the tension between India and Pakistan is at its peak compared to the past few years.
Guterres warned India against starting a war with Pakistan and emphasized avoiding any military conflict that could spiral out of control. He expressed his gratitude to both countries' governments and people for their significant contributions to the work of the United Nations, including peacekeeping forces, and noted that he is saddened by the escalating tensions between the two nations.
He strongly condemned the horrific terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22, expressing his condolences to the victims’ families. He stated that targeting civilians is unacceptable and that those responsible should be brought to justice through credible and legal channels.
Guterres warned India that this is a delicate moment and urged restraint, advising against any military action that could get out of hand. He said this is the time for utmost patience and for taking a step back.
The UN Secretary-General also conveyed the message to both countries that military solutions are not solutions. He offered the United Nations' office to both governments as a mediator, ready to cooperate on any actions that would reduce tensions, promote diplomacy, and encourage a renewed commitment to peace
UN Security Council Holds Closed-Door Meeting on Pak-India Tensions at Pakistan's Request
In a significant diplomatic achievement, Pakistan successfully requested a closed-door meeting of the United Nations Security Council to address the escalating tensions between India and Pakistan. The meeting, held in New York, included the participation of 15 members of the Security Council, including the 5 permanent members. The special session was convened to discuss the situation, with Pakistan's mission fully prepared under the leadership of Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar to present Pakistan's case.
Pakistan informed the member states about India's provocative statements and actions that threaten peace. Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmed briefed the members on India's suspension of the Indus Water Treaty. According to sources, Pakistan also brought attention to the Kashmir dispute and the right of the Kashmiri people to self-determination. Pakistan urged the Security Council to take note of the regional security risks and to take measures to de-escalate tensions.
Ambassador Asim Iftikhar, speaking after the session, emphasized that India's actions have posed significant threats to peace and security in the region. He reiterated Pakistan's readiness to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Pakistan rejected the allegations of involvement in the Pahalgam attack and expressed concerns over India's recent actions. Asim Iftikhar also reiterated that Pakistan remains on the frontlines in the fight against terrorism. Despite 70 years passing, the Kashmir issue remains unresolved.
Shortly before the meeting, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres held a phone call to discuss the current security situation in South Asia. This was the second phone call between the two leaders within a week. The Prime Minister appreciated the UN Secretary-General's efforts to engage with the situation in South Asia and the need to reduce tensions while avoiding any potential conflict. The Prime Minister reaffirmed Pakistan's offer for an independent, transparent, and impartial investigation and highlighted that India has yet to provide any evidence while continuing provocative rhetoric. He reiterated Pakistan's commitment to defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
The UN Secretary-General informed the Prime Minister about his efforts for peace and stability in the region and expressed his commitment to remaining in contact with all parties involved in the matter. Antonio Guterres has also offered to mediate between Pakistan and India, acknowledging the heightened tensions between the two countries and urging India to refrain from initiating a war with Pakistan, emphasizing the need to avoid any military conflict that could spiral out of control
F.A.Q
Q1: What was discussed in the UN Security Council meeting on Pakistan-India tensions?
The meeting focused on the escalating tensions between Pakistan and India, with Pakistan presenting its case regarding provocative actions by India, including the suspension of the Indus Water Treaty and the Kashmir dispute.
Q2: How did the UN Secretary-General intervene in the Pakistan-India situation?
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres offered to mediate between Pakistan and India, urging both nations to avoid any military conflict and emphasizing the need for dialogue and diplomacy to resolve the Kashmir issue.
Q3: Why is the Kashmir issue considered a central topic in Pakistan-India relations?
The Kashmir dispute remains a core issue between Pakistan and India, with both nations holding differing views. Pakistan advocates for the self-determination of the Kashmiri people, a right recognized under international law.
Q4: How does the Indus Water Treaty impact Pakistan-India relations?
The Indus Water Treaty, a critical agreement between Pakistan and India, governs water distribution from rivers flowing through both countries. India's recent suspension of the treaty has escalated tensions, raising concerns over regional security.
Q5: What role is the UN playing in resolving the tensions between Pakistan and India?
The UN has been actively involved in facilitating dialogue between Pakistan and India. The Secretary-General has offered to mediate and assist in de-escalating the situation, emphasizing the importance of diplomatic efforts for regional stability.
Call to Action (CTA):
Stay informed about the latest developments in South Asian geopolitics. Subscribe to our newsletter for regular updates on diplomatic efforts, regional peace initiatives, and more insights on Pakistan-India relations
Tags
(Features)